The Ethics of "Poaching"
I read an interesting article this morning about the ethics of poaching; not hunting animals out of season, but rather the idea of specifically recruiting or targeting key talent that works for another organization typically a competitor.
I have to tell you that my initial reaction was "what"? As the article went on it did differentiate between specifically targeting an organization with the intention of undermining them through recruitment of their key talent or recruiting with the intent of obtaining trade secrets or proprietary information, but short of that indicated it was ok. Thanks for permission.
It kind of takes to thinking that our lexicon has gotten to the place where we really have started to believe phrases like human capital. One small problem, our employees don't "belong" to us. We "rent" their knowledge, skills, and behaviors and for a period of time if we are skilled and lucky we create a bond of mutual loyalty because of respect and commitment, period.
I think the timing is especially interesting now that it looks like the economy may be picking up. I see a lot of questions out there from organizations about what they should be doing about retention in the face of a more robust economy. I advise prayer. I am only being semi sarcastic. I am stunned by organizations who do not make investments in engaging and retaining employees on an ongoing basis and then want to install a program to fix it when there are issues.
Employment at will is a concept that most employers will defend with the ferocity of Charlton Heston over the right to keep and bear arms- as long as it is balanced in their favor. They don't like it when employees see themselves as free agents.
I hear a lot about loyalty as well. I define loyalty pretty simply. We interact with trust and respect. We meet our commitments to each other and we take into consideration our actions on the impact of the others in the organization when making decisions, period. Out in the Wild West where I grew up we called it "riding for the brand". While I was sleeping in your bunkhouse and eating your food I was present, you got my honest effort. There were no life contracts or pledges of fealty.
I guess I am a career poacher. When I see people who are really good at their jobs and whose skills might be transferable to an organization I work with or for I feel comfortable bringing to their attention that if they are interested in exploring options I would like to talk with them.
As you know I am a huge believer in the concept of engagement. I guess my model is the best way to keep your employees from being "poached" is to create an environment where they don't actively seek or entertain other options because of the relationship of mutual respect and trust you have created. If my employees find another opportunity that they feel meets their needs or provides them with a chance to expand a skill base I wish them well if it is the right opportunity. You see I have found ex employees to be one of my best sources of future employees, if I treated them well they remember it and share it with their friends and associates.
So I guess with the exceptions of targeting or attempting to take trade secrets we need to acknowledge there is no such thing as poaching. Mr. Lincoln freed the slaves well over 100 years ago, people can't "steal" something from us we never owned in the first place.....
I have to tell you that my initial reaction was "what"? As the article went on it did differentiate between specifically targeting an organization with the intention of undermining them through recruitment of their key talent or recruiting with the intent of obtaining trade secrets or proprietary information, but short of that indicated it was ok. Thanks for permission.
It kind of takes to thinking that our lexicon has gotten to the place where we really have started to believe phrases like human capital. One small problem, our employees don't "belong" to us. We "rent" their knowledge, skills, and behaviors and for a period of time if we are skilled and lucky we create a bond of mutual loyalty because of respect and commitment, period.
I think the timing is especially interesting now that it looks like the economy may be picking up. I see a lot of questions out there from organizations about what they should be doing about retention in the face of a more robust economy. I advise prayer. I am only being semi sarcastic. I am stunned by organizations who do not make investments in engaging and retaining employees on an ongoing basis and then want to install a program to fix it when there are issues.
Employment at will is a concept that most employers will defend with the ferocity of Charlton Heston over the right to keep and bear arms- as long as it is balanced in their favor. They don't like it when employees see themselves as free agents.
I hear a lot about loyalty as well. I define loyalty pretty simply. We interact with trust and respect. We meet our commitments to each other and we take into consideration our actions on the impact of the others in the organization when making decisions, period. Out in the Wild West where I grew up we called it "riding for the brand". While I was sleeping in your bunkhouse and eating your food I was present, you got my honest effort. There were no life contracts or pledges of fealty.
I guess I am a career poacher. When I see people who are really good at their jobs and whose skills might be transferable to an organization I work with or for I feel comfortable bringing to their attention that if they are interested in exploring options I would like to talk with them.
As you know I am a huge believer in the concept of engagement. I guess my model is the best way to keep your employees from being "poached" is to create an environment where they don't actively seek or entertain other options because of the relationship of mutual respect and trust you have created. If my employees find another opportunity that they feel meets their needs or provides them with a chance to expand a skill base I wish them well if it is the right opportunity. You see I have found ex employees to be one of my best sources of future employees, if I treated them well they remember it and share it with their friends and associates.
So I guess with the exceptions of targeting or attempting to take trade secrets we need to acknowledge there is no such thing as poaching. Mr. Lincoln freed the slaves well over 100 years ago, people can't "steal" something from us we never owned in the first place.....
Labels: commitment, employment at will, engagement, loyalty, poaching, recruiting, respect, retention

3 Comments:
Excellent post, Mark. An article was posted in the New York Times yesterday about consultants and freelancers and how more and more people are turning to that model of work style rather than commit to ONE company.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/20/business/economy/20contractor.html?scp=1&sq=temporary%20employees&st=cse
I found the comments even more interesting than the article. Maybe at some point companies actually cared about their employees, their work-life balance, their goals and ambitions. That time is long gone. The recession has just allowed us to see a glimpse of the true colors of commitment-based "human capital". I'm with you on the prayer thing. The only real barrier to being a "free-agent" is affordable health care and it looks like that is one barrier that won't be here forever.
You might be a career poacher but I'm a company poacher. I don't believe in exclusivity. The companies I work for "rent" my knowledge and skill set and in return I give them the best work I can give. I feel good about the work that I'm doing and the companies I'm helping to build.
It's a very satisfying life.
Thanks for the great post!
Good post. Unfortunately, most companies still live with a feudal mentality wherein everyone bows to their command. Hopefully, you'll help change that medieval mindset. Or, a nice, massive employee walk-out across all sectors, nationwide, will be needed. An epic strike against companies that pay CEO's tens of millions when front line employees make $25k yearly. And against companies that reward a handful of parasites that rely on fraud to make short term personal profit while driving the company into ruins, e.g. most of the large financial players. And against the companies who cash out or sink the enterprise while stealing pension funds. This isn't capitalism; it's just crimes perpetrated by too many company executives that see themselves as kings in the feudal system. So, you have your work cut out for you to change that mindset.
Ken
Thanks Jenny and Ken.
Jenny, I know for a fact when people "rent" your behavior you ride for the brand and give them much more than they pay for, your work is consistently 'top drawer"!
Ken- the nice thing about being at the stage of my life where I focus on "what matters" is doing the work and making change even one organization at a time is satisfying. To quote Dylan- "the times, they are a changin" I think more employers are going to figure that out!
M
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home